

Megaprop Corporate Homes
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Share Your Experience1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
I have never experienced such bad service then I have from Nick , does not respond to calls or messages,blue ticks after days but with no response we have to call him repeatedly and the service is shocking.Run
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
I have never experienced such bad service then I have from Nick , does not respond to calls or messages,blue ticks after days but with no response we have to call him repeatedly and the service is shocking.Run
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
After several requests and waiting for 29 days for my deposit it was finally returned to me. R 1750.00 was deducted. The deduction was unjustified, because the two small cracks in the window were caused by the renovators of the building and I did report it when it happened. I did report it to Nick Judes father, which was working their at the time - Roy Jude. Roy Jude was also the one which signed me up to the flat. Whenever their was a problem I contacted Roy Jude.<br> Nick Jude contradicted himself in many conversations saying his father never worked for Megaprop. <br> We left the place more improved as we got it and I was charged for : <br> - small patch of uneven painting on the wall. I bought the right paint from Roy Jude, to tidy up little scratches, <br> - cracks in two windows<br> - little damage on the wall (movers), which I wanted to fix, but I was told by Nick Jude, he will not wait till I fix it, although it was only the 28th of the months. I written many letters to Nick Jude, requesting a proper invoice. I was threatened by him, that if I expose his company (defarmation), he will sue me - I am still waiting for an valid invoice for my money deducted.
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
After several requests and waiting for 29 days for my deposit it was finally returned to me. R 1750.00 was deducted. The deduction was unjustified, because the two small cracks in the window were caused by the renovators of the building and I did report it when it happened. I did report it to Nick Judes father, which was working their at the time - Roy Jude. Roy Jude was also the one which signed me up to the flat. Whenever their was a problem I contacted Roy Jude.<br> Nick Jude contradicted himself in many conversations saying his father never worked for Megaprop. <br> We left the place more improved as we got it and I was charged for : <br> - small patch of uneven painting on the wall. I bought the right paint from Roy Jude, to tidy up little scratches, <br> - cracks in two windows<br> - little damage on the wall (movers), which I wanted to fix, but I was told by Nick Jude, he will not wait till I fix it, although it was only the 28th of the months. I written many letters to Nick Jude, requesting a proper invoice. I was threatened by him, that if I expose his company (defarmation), he will sue me - I am still waiting for an valid invoice for my money deducted.
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
Nick has passed the buck over to the office administrator to deal with me after inquiring my deposit to be paid back after vacating the premises.<br> The lease agreement says the deposit will be paid back 7 days after vacating the apartment but not longer than 14 days after inspection. The apartment had been inspected on the 1st of October 2014<br> After 14 days, nothing had been communicated to me. LeeAnn then emailed me to say that what the contract means is that it's 14 days after everything has been finalised-another delay tactic. I had paid the outstanding electricity amount early in October and counted 14 days<br> On the 6th of November I receive an email saying that payment will be made on the day and to send my banking details. Four days later nothing had been received. It was only done after further investigations and Nick deducting the electricity that I had paid in October<br> This is not the right way to conduct business-I hope that in the future that you won't delay and put your own meanings of contracts as a delay tactic
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
Nick has passed the buck over to the office administrator to deal with me after inquiring my deposit to be paid back after vacating the premises.<br> The lease agreement says the deposit will be paid back 7 days after vacating the apartment but not longer than 14 days after inspection. The apartment had been inspected on the 1st of October 2014<br> After 14 days, nothing had been communicated to me. LeeAnn then emailed me to say that what the contract means is that it's 14 days after everything has been finalised-another delay tactic. I had paid the outstanding electricity amount early in October and counted 14 days<br> On the 6th of November I receive an email saying that payment will be made on the day and to send my banking details. Four days later nothing had been received. It was only done after further investigations and Nick deducting the electricity that I had paid in October<br> This is not the right way to conduct business-I hope that in the future that you won't delay and put your own meanings of contracts as a delay tactic